| ¡¡ Lou Lang CNN Interview
12/26/2008 regarding impeachment panel
proceedings
¡¡
Illinois State Representative Lou Lang
is on that impeachment panel. Thanks for
joining us this afternoon on a Friday,
representative.
REP. LOU LANG (D), ILLINOIS GENERAL
ASSEMBLY: My pleasure.
LUI: What's the committee's response
right now?
LANG: Well, the committee is still
reviewing the request by Mr. Genson.
Last Monday when the committee last met,
Mr. Genson indicated he needed a week to
prepare, and that he would be ready this
coming Monday with some witnesses. It
was only the very next day when the
committee was not meeting that he
decided he wanted to subpoena these
folks that you were mentioning. And I
might add that the United States
attorney has told the committee that he
does not want these people to appear
because he's concerned that it will
jeopardize his investigation.
LUI: What do you make of his request?
You mentioned timing there, but the
specific request and who the individuals
are on this list -- what do you make of
that strategy?
LANG: Well, certainly from a point of
view of a defense lawyer, I understand
what he's trying to do. And if Mr.
Genson wanted to call those folks in a
criminal trial I would -- if I was he I
would do the same thing.
However, the impeachment panel is not a
criminal tribunal. Our job is to put
facts on the table and to determine if
-- just like a grand jury -- if there
are enough facts, if there is enough
evidence to charge the governor and send
it to the Senate for trial.
The only issue is whether Rod
Blagojevich has violated his
constitutional oath and/or whether he's
fit to continue to be governor of the
state of Illinois.
I think Mr. Genson is trying to turn our
deliberations into a circus. And I'm not
sure the committee is going to let him
do that.
LUI: You know, if Governor Blagojevich
believes a subpoena of Rahm Emanuel and
Valerie Jarrett might actually help his
client's case here, why not hear from
them?
LANG: Well, certainly that might be
valid testimony in a criminal case, but
two issues here.
First, it's not necessary to convict
Governor Blagojevich of a crime to
impeach him. Whether those wiretaps, for
instance, are admissible into evidence
in the federal court are of little
consequence in our committee.
Additionally, Mr. Genson who has had an
extraordinary amount of freedom within
our committee to question witnesses,
told us he'd be ready in a week. The
people of the state of Illinois have a
right an end to this procedure.
And additionally, the U.S. attorney and
the committee have agreed that we will
not step on his toes. So we're, I don't
think, going to be of a mind, although
we haven't fully discussed it as a
committee, to allow this side show to
take place in the middle of our
deliberations.
LUI: So, Representative Lang, your
committee, your special group, is
charged with coming to a decision at
some point. When might we expect to hear
from you? LANG: Well, depending on what
happens with Mr. Genson's request, and
whether there are many more witnesses or
just a few, the last I saw we only had a
few witnesses left that the committee
wanted to call, we could be finished
with our deliberations within a week or
two, I believe. And then, of course,
there will be a report that will go to
the full house, and the full house will
determine whether there are any articles
of impeachment to send to the Senate.
LUI: Illinois State Representative Lou
Lang on the impeachment panel there in
the state.
Thank you so much for stopping by,
giving us the very latest on these
requests by Rod Blagojevich's
representation. Thank you so much.
Source: CNN.com, Transcripts Aired
December 26, 2008 - 13:00ET
Link
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0812/26/cnr.05.html
|